<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mumag on ferrolith</title><link>https://www.ferrolith.org/tags/mumag/</link><description>Recent content in Mumag on ferrolith</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.ferrolith.org/tags/mumag/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>µMAG Standard Problem #2</title><link>https://www.ferrolith.org/posts/benchmarks/mumag-sp2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.ferrolith.org/posts/benchmarks/mumag-sp2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~rdm/mumag.org.html"&gt;μMAG Standard Problem #2&lt;/a&gt; studies the switching behaviour of a Permalloy thin-film rectangular element (length $5d$, width $d$, thickness $0.1d$) as a function of the particle size $d$ measured in exchange lengths $l_{\mathrm{ex}} = \sqrt{2A / \mu_0 M_s^2}$. A saturating field is applied along the diagonal of the film (1,1,0.1) direction, then reversed to obtain the hysteresis loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The key results are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;$H_c / M_s$&lt;/strong&gt; — coercive field (normalised by $M_s$)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;$M_{rx} / M_s$&lt;/strong&gt; — remanent magnetisation, $x$-component&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;$M_{ry} / M_s$&lt;/strong&gt; — remanent magnetisation, $y$-component&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the small-particle limit ($d/l_{\mathrm{ex}} \to 0$) the magnetisation is nearly uniform and a 3D Stoner-Wohlfarth analysis gives $H_c / M_s = 0.05707$.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>µMAG Standard Problem #3</title><link>https://www.ferrolith.org/posts/benchmarks/mumag-sp3/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.ferrolith.org/posts/benchmarks/mumag-sp3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~rdm/std3/spec3.html"&gt;μMAG Standard Problem #3&lt;/a&gt; determines the single domain limit of a cubic magnetic particle — the critical edge length $L$ (in units of exchange length $l_{\mathrm{ex}} = \sqrt{A / K_m}$, where $K_m = \frac{1}{2} \mu_0 M_s^2$) at which the &amp;ldquo;flower state&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;vortex state&amp;rdquo; have equal total energy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The uniaxial anisotropy constant is $K_u = 0.1,K_m$ with the easy axis along $z$. All energies are normalised by $K_m L^3$.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The expected result is $L \approx 8.47,l_{\mathrm{ex}}$.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>µMAG Standard Problem #4</title><link>https://www.ferrolith.org/posts/benchmarks/mumag-sp4/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.ferrolith.org/posts/benchmarks/mumag-sp4/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~rdm/std4/spec4.html"&gt;μMAG Standard Problem #4&lt;/a&gt; studies the time-dependent magnetisation reversal of a thin-film Permalloy rectangle (500 nm × 125 nm × 3 nm) with material parameters $M_s$ = 8 × 10⁵ A/m, $A$ = 1.3 × 10⁻¹¹ J/m, $\alpha$ = 0.02.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The system is initialised in an S-state (obtained by relaxing from saturation along the [1, 1, 1] direction) and then subjected to a reversing field:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Field 1:&lt;/strong&gt; $\mu_0 H$ = −25 mT at 170° from the $+x$ axis&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Field 2:&lt;/strong&gt; $\mu_0 H$ = −36 mT at 190° from the $+x$ axis&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reported quantities are the spatially averaged magnetisation components $\langle M_x \rangle / M_s$, $\langle M_y \rangle / M_s$, $\langle M_z \rangle / M_s$ as a function of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>